Which predictor is associated with Schmidt & Hunter's discussion on job performance validity?

Which predictor is associated with Schmidt & Hunter's discussion on job performance validity?

• A. General Mental Ability
• B. Biodata
• C. Paired Comparison
• D. Theory X

Answer: (A)

Schmidt & Hunter’s discussion of job performance validity highlights cognitive ability as the strongest single predictor of how well someone will perform on the job. General mental ability tends to have the highest observed correlations with job performance across a wide range of occupations, making it the most consistent and powerful predictor in their meta-analyses. While other predictors like biodata can be useful and structured interviews add value, none surpass general mental ability as a standalone predictor. Paired comparison is a method for ranking candidates rather than a predictor of performance itself, and Theory X is a management theory, not a predictor of job performance.

Schmidt & Hunter’s discussion of job performance validity highlights cognitive ability as the strongest single predictor of how well someone will perform on the job. General mental ability tends to have the highest observed correlations with job performance across a wide range of occupations, making it the most consistent and powerful predictor in their meta-analyses. While other predictors like biodata can be useful and structured interviews add value, none surpass general mental ability as a standalone predictor. Paired comparison is a method for ranking candidates rather than a predictor of performance itself, and Theory X is a management theory, not a predictor of job performance.